This is what we need to do if we want to ever restore either FAITH in our voting system or the ability to uncover corruption and root it out in order to restore FAITH.
It’s encouraging to see that there is still some fairness in the judicial system.
According to The Gateway Pundit,
Kari Lake’s petition to examine votes from the county’s 2022 midterm election was approved by a judge in Maricopa County.
By Friday at noon, the Lake campaign must decide on a designated ballot inspector and give the court their contact information. The inspection would start at 8 a.m. on December 20, 2022.
The Lake Campaign has requested the study of: Fifty “ballot-on-demand” (BOD) printed ballots drawn at random from six Maricopa County voting locations on election day
2) Fifty early ballots from the 2022 general election, randomly chosen, from six batches in Maricopa County, selected by her representative.
3) Fifty randomly chosen early ballot envelopes for Maricopa County voters who cast early ballots in the general election of 2022
4) Fifty printed ballots from six different Maricopa County vote locations, chosen at random, that were marked spoilt on election day.
The judge rejected request 3, which would have permitted the examination of fifty early ballot envelopes chosen at random from Maricopa County’s early ballots. The justification offered was as follows:
Request (3), on the other hand, goes beyond the statutory parameters of permissible examination and asks for the scrutiny of early voting packets. Even though they arrive as a “package” as the plaintiff claims, early-ballot return envelopes are not ballots in and of themselves. The defendants are true that votes do not have signatures, unlike return envelopes.
In fact, they are unable to do so since the Arizona Constitution stipulates that “secrecy in voting shall be preserved” through any voting procedure outlined by the legislature.